Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Druggan v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1999No. 1996-2395PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 680.] THE STATE EX REL. DRUGGAN, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE; KINNEAR DIVISION, HARSCO CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Druggan v. Indus. Comm.,

1999-Ohio-335.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion in ordering claimant to submit to a medical examination on the issue of ongoing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment, when. (No. 96-2395—Submitted March 9, 1999—Decided June 23, 1999.) APPEAL and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Smothers v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Druggan v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Kinnear Div., Harsco Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kaminski v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State ex rel. McCormack v. Ashtabula Cty. Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API