Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kinnear Div., Harsco Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1997No. 1994-2390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 258.] THE STATE EX REL. KINNEAR DIVISION, HARSCO CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, V. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; DRUGGAN, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Kinnear Div., Harsco Corp. v. Indus. Comm.,

1997-Ohio-40.] Workers’ compensation—Application for permanent total disability compensation—Industrial Commission’s order granting compensation remanded when order does not disclose reasoning for finding that claimant’s retirement was involuntary. (No. 94-2390—Submitted October 8,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Certified Oil Corp. v. Mabe, 06ap-835 (7-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Druggan v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API