Evergreen Waste Systems, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service District
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
PANNER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Evergreen Waste Systems, Inc. and ABC Garbage Co. (referred to collectively as Evergreen) bring this action to invalidate a local ordinance governing use of a landfill. Defendants are the Metropolitan Service District (District), the City of Portland (City), and Norm Wietting, a District official. I find for defendants.
Evergreen brings three claims. In its first claim, Evergreen challenges an ordinance that prohibits the deposit of waste from outside the District at a District-operated landfill. Evergreen, which had hauled waste from Washington to the landfill…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hunt v. Chemical Waste ManagementSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Bill Kettlewell Excavating, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
- Lefrancois v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1987
- Evergreen Waste Systems, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Swin Resource Systems, Inc. v. Lycoming County, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.