Legal Opinion
Patison v. Dye
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 2002No. Nos. 00-56473, 00-56476, 00-56485, 00-56486; D.C. Nos. CV-99-00710-AHS, CV-99-00850-AHS, CV-99-01122-AHS, CV-98-01032-AHSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
James Patison appeals the district court’s decisions affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders in four consolidated cases. Patison raises numerous claims challenging the bankruptcy court’s orders (1) imposing sanctions for not properly serving a subpoena; (2) revoking Patison’s employment as counsel for the unsecured creditors; (3) imposing sanctions for filing a frivolous motion to reconsider; and (4) granting summary judgment in favor of the Trustee and awarding punitive damages against Patison. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Joe Morgan v. Bill Woessner, and Clay Searle Los Angeles City, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Andersons, Inc. v. Consol, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002