Legal Opinion

Andersons, Inc. v. Consol, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 2, 2002No. 3:00CV7290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, District Judge.

This is a suit by a lessor of railway cars, The Andersons, Inc., against a prospective lessee of cars. The negotiations for a lease were not successful. Plaintiff brought this suit, asserting a variety of claims. Defendant moved for summary judgment. I concluded, on lengthy and detailed consideration, that none of plaintiffs claims had merit. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was, accordingly, granted.

Thereafter, plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider. On initial review of the motion, I concluded that it did not raise any argument that was not raised and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Atkins v. Marathon LeTourneau Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
  3. McConocha v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mut. of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  4. Linda Allinder v. Inter-City Products Corporation (Usa), Robert HenningsenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Dana Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joe v. Minnesota Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
  2. Gitler v. OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API