Andersons, Inc. v. Consol, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a suit by a lessor of railway cars, The Andersons, Inc., against a prospective lessee of cars. The negotiations for a lease were not successful. Plaintiff brought this suit, asserting a variety of claims. Defendant moved for summary judgment. I concluded, on lengthy and detailed consideration, that none of plaintiffs claims had merit. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was, accordingly, granted.
Thereafter, plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider. On initial review of the motion, I concluded that it did not raise any argument that was not raised and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Atkins v. Marathon LeTourneau Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
- McConocha v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mut. of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- Linda Allinder v. Inter-City Products Corporation (Usa), Robert HenningsenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joe v. Minnesota Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
- Gitler v. OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009