Kirschner & Venker, P.C. v. Taylor & Martino, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
The law firm of Kirschner & Venker, P.C. (K&V) appeals from the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment to its former co-counsel, Taylor & Martino, P.C. (T&M) and Tyler McCaine, Esq., in this dispute over attorney fees. K&V argues that the trial court erred in concluding that it was only entitled to receive quantum meruit for its legal services after being discharged from the case by the parties’ common client before any contingency fee became due. We discern no error and affirm.
On appeal from the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment, we conduct a de…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holbrook v. StansellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- GREER, KLOSIK AND DAUGHERTY v. YetmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Glover v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- ELLERIN & ASSOCIATES v. BrawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Kilgore v. SheetzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- TOLSON Et Al. v. SISTRUNK Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Amstead v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Eichholz Law Firm, P.C. v. Tate Law Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Brault Graham, LLC v. Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, P.CCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- In Re HallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.