Legal Opinion
Eichholz Law Firm, P.C. v. Tate Law Group, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 13, 2011No. A11A0704PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Presiding Judge.
The Eichholz Law Firm, PC. (the Eichholz firm) and Weinstock & Scavo, EC. (the Weinstock firm) brought an action against Tate Law Group, LLC (the Tate firm) and Mark Tate for, inter alia, breach of two joint venture agreements between the Eichholz firm and the Tate firm, which agreements included provisions for splitting attorney fees. The Eichholz firm had assigned its interest in attorney fees under one of the joint venture agreements to the Weinstock firm. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the Tate firm and Mark Tate, and denied partial summary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Cowart v. WidenerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Aflac, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Nelson & Hill, P.A. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- INNOVATIVE IMAGES, LLC v. SUMMERVILLESupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- TOLSON Et Al. v. SISTRUNK Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- James Darren Summerville v. Innovative Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- The Eichholz Law Firm, Pc v. Tate Law Group, LLC. Et At.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- LEAH ZAMMIT v. HOBSON & HOBSON, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.