Legal Opinion

United States v. Jane Crawford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2001No. 99-50803PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSUP, District Judge:

Jane Crawford appeals her jury convictions for two counts each of wire fraud and interstate transportation of property stolen, converted, or taken through fraud. The jury implicitly found that Crawford took a valuable oil painting from her office at UCLA, intending to deprive the owner of its use, and sold it for profit, knowing that it had been stolen, converted, or taken through fraud. The jury also implicitly found that Crawford (or a co-schemer) had sent and received interstate faxes to advance her scheme to obtain money through false pretenses. The dispositive issue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Melvin Frank SchaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Chu Kong Yin, AKA Alfred ChuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Times Communications, LLC v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  2. United States v. Dereck Ricardo HoskinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Duane A. WillfongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. TumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Alexander RashkovskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API