Legal Opinion

United States v. Tum

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 1, 2013No. 11-1624PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

Overview

Abdela Turn asks us to overturn his bench-trial convictions for violating and conspiring to violate the federal wire-fraud statute, a law that (at the risk of oversimplification) criminalizes a scheme to defraud involving an interstate-wire communication. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349. Turn’s attack basically comes in two waves. Convinced that the evidence failed to show that he had caused an interstate-wire transmission, he argues first that his wire-fraud convictions cannot stand. Reminding us that conspiracy involves a knowing agreement between two or more…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Reyes-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Rodriguez-SolerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Marcus TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. William MarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API