Legal Opinion

United States v. Chu Kong Yin, AKA Alfred Chu

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1991No. 89-10408PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Chu Kong Yin (Chu) appeals from his conviction and sentence of fifteen years imprisonment for making false statements on an Application for Status as Permanent Resident in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1546. Chu raises four arguments on appeal: (1) the district court erred in concluding that certain public documents from Hong Kong were properly authenticated; (2) the district court admitted documents containing inadmissible hearsay; (3) the jury’s verdict against Chu was not supported by substantial evidence; and (4) the district court’s sentence of fifteen years’…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. In the Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. PonceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API