Legal Opinion

Shann v. City of Rapid City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1948No. File No. 8946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the city to recover damages due to water and sewage backing up in a sanitary sewer to which plaintiff’s property was connected. The facts disclose that plaintiff’s property was serviced by a six-inch sanitary sewer line constructed and maintained as a part of the municipal sewer system. This six-inch line originated approximately two blocks east of plaintiff’s property and ran in a westerly direction through the alley in the rear of the property and into a manhole within one-half a block from plaintiff’s home. There were about twenty connections on to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. King v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Tate v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Nelson v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Haley & Lang Co. v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leslie v. City of BonesteelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rikansrud v. City of CantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Blue Fox Bar, Inc. v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Shann v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Blue Fox Bar, Inc. v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API