Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Oppenheimer

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1965No. Crim. 10053PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

For the reasons set out below, we modify the judgment of conviction heretofore entered against defendant and affirm the judgment as so modified.

By an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County on October 16, 1961, defendant was charged with . . the crime of Escape from the Custody of a Deputy Sheriff of the County of Los Angeles, In Violation of Section 4532, Penal Code, a felony . . . while charged with a felony to wit, Extortion, and while convicted of a crime, to wit, Violation of Section 594, Penal Code, a misdemeanor.” After a trial before a jury, defendant was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. CauseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. VizcarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API