Legal Opinion

Bills v. Hannah, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1988No. 87-225PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

The District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District granted summary judgment upon motion by respondents Hannah Incorporated and Conrad’s Real Estate and Insurance (Hannah and Conrad). In a memorandum accompanying the summary judgment order, the lower court held that no material questions of fact existed, and that Hannah and Conrad were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Darrell and David McCracken, Betty McCracken Bills, Judy South, and Carol Ehresman, (McCrackens), appeal contending that the lower court erred by finding that no material questions of fact existed. Hannah and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mallory v. WattIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ellingson Agency, Inc. v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Palin v. Gebert Logging, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McDonald v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Niles v. Carl Weissman & Sons, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sistok v. Kalispell Regional HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Joyner v. OnstadMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Joyner v. OnstadMontana Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API