Legal Opinion

Sistok v. Kalispell Regional Hospital

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1991No. 91-137PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

Plaintiff, Victor Sistok, appeals from the order of the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, quashing a deposition subpoena and granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The court ruled that the evidence presented failed to demonstrate that Kalispell Regional Hospital acted negligently by permitting Dr. Paul W. Herron to perform surgery on Mr. Sistok in its facility. We affirm.

We note that the appellant, Victor Sistok, has died since this case was submitted for appellate review, and a motion to suggest death of the appellant has been submitted. No motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bieber v. Broadwater CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bills v. Hannah, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Tucker v. Trotter Treadmills, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huether v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Huether v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Robinson v. Our Sisters of CharityMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Sistok v. Kalispell Regional HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API