Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 28, 2006No. 05-1129CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court after briefing on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The issues for decision are (1) whether the United States Court of Federal Claims lacks subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC *48112(b)(1) where plaintiffs claims for military retirement pay are brought outside the six-year period prescribed for actions under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (2000), or, alternatively, whether plaintiffs claims should be dismissed pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Lanier-Finn v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  4. Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Ortiz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API