Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 2, 2010No. 08-47PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending before the court is plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record.1 Also pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss and, in the alternative, cross-motion for judgment on the administrative record. The motions are fully briefed and are ready for disposition. We deem oral argument unnecessary. For the reasons set forth below, we grant defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND 2

Mr. Williams joined the United States Navy Reserve in 1962 and served for approx*563imately ten months before entering active duty in the United States Army where he served in the 82nd Airborne…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ceres Gulf, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Vero Technical Support, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Chapman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API