Lanier-Finn v. Department of the Army
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Doc. No. 12. The Court has reviewed the motion papers and concludes that no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6 (D.Md. 2011). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion will be GRANTED.1
I. BACKGROUND
The following is taken from Plaintiffs Complaint and the administrative record (AR) filed by Defendant, the Department of the Army. See Doc. Nos. 1,11. Plaintiff *479Louise Lanier-Finn, proceeding pro se in this action, was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D’URVILLE A. CHRISTOPHER, SR. v. AUDREY Y. DAVIS, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Peter T. von Gronefeld v. Frank Kendall, III, Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026