Legal Opinion

Lanier-Finn v. Department of the Army

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-cv-03658-AWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Doc. No. 12. The Court has reviewed the motion papers and concludes that no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6 (D.Md. 2011). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion will be GRANTED.1

I. BACKGROUND

The following is taken from Plaintiffs Complaint and the administrative record (AR) filed by Defendant, the Department of the Army. See Doc. Nos. 1,11. Plaintiff *479Louise Lanier-Finn, proceeding pro se in this action, was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D’URVILLE A. CHRISTOPHER, SR. v. AUDREY Y. DAVIS, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  2. Peter T. von Gronefeld v. Frank Kendall, III, Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API