Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Clark

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1884No. 11,179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for the value of a horse killed by one of its trains, in. the town of Salem, in Washington county. The venue having been changed, the case was tried in Floyd county.

The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first charges a. negligent killing, without fault on the part of the plaintiff. The second -is based upon the statute, and charges a failure to-fence. The case is presented for review upon the evidence' alone.

Appellant’s counsel urge, with ability, that the judgment can not be maintained upon the first paragraph of the complaint, because of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. BrevoortIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. R. v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Fort Wayne, Muncie, & Cincinnati R. R. v. MussetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Leak.Indiana Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. HerboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Banister v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API