Legal Opinion
William Selko v. Home Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 12, 1998No. 96-1702PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge.
William Seiko (“Seiko”), who is the assign-ee of his former attorney’s professional liability policy, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment denying recovery on this policy against Home Insurance Company (“Home”).
I
In 1982, at age 18, Seiko was the passenger in a car that struck a telephone pole. The accident rendered him a quadriplegic. He and his father engaged Stephen R. Signore, Jr., a Pennsylvania attorney, who has since been disbarred, to represent him in obtaining compensation for his injuries. Signore prepared and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Bateman v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- O'Brien Energy Systems, Inc. v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, H/w Patsy Dezii William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, Patsy DeziiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Coregis Insurance Company v. Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq. Kenneth Lee Danielle Lee Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Colliers Lanard & Axilbund v. Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Liebling v. Garden State Indem.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- USX Corp. v. Adriatic Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.