Legal Opinion
Colliers Lanard & Axilbund v. Lloyds of London
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 11, 2006No. 05-3497PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Lloyds of London (“Lloyds”) provided a “claims made” professional liability insurance policy 1 to appellee Colliers, Lanard & Axilbund (“CL & A”), a real estate brokerage. The policy provided retroactive coverage for claims “provided that the insured had no knowledge of any suit, or any act or error or omission, which might reasonably be expected to result in a claim or suit as of the date of signing the application for this insurance.” CL & A brought a breach of contract action in the District Court after Lloyds denied coverage for a claim arising from a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Zuckerman v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Werner Industries, Inc. v. First State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- CRS Auto Parts, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- United States v. Citgo Asphalt Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Colliers Lanard & Axilbund v. Lloyds Of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Trunzo v. Citi MortgageDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- State of California Department of General Services v. W.R. Grace & Co. (In Re W.R. Grace & Co.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.