United States v. Aviles
District Court, S.D. California
Baltazar Aviles and others were indicted for a conspiracy. On motion to quash indictment and to require the United States attorney to give defendants a list of witnesses examined before .the grand jury.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIPPET, District Judge.
This is an indictment for a conspiracy. Certain defendants have moved the court to quash the indictment, and to require the United States attorney to give them a list of the witnesses examined before the grand jury, when the grand jury had under consideration the question of presenting the indictment.
[ 1 ] The motion to quash has raised the question that the indictment does not sufficiently charge the venue. The allegation concerning the formation of the conspiracy is simply that it was formed within the jurisdiction of the court, without specifying any' particular…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Van DuzeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Holesome v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
- United States v. SoblenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.