Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Griffiths

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1943No. 467PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

The question in this case is whether the Acts of Congress and the administrative regulations thereunder afford a basis on which we may reconsider the decision in *372Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. S. 189, and pass on the Government’s request that it be overruled.

During the calendar year 1939 respondent owned 101 shares of common stock of the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey. Twice during the year that corporation made appropriate transfers from, earned surplus to its capital accounts, in amounts less than the net accumulation of earnings and profits subsequent to February 28, 1913, and against them…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Caves v. YarbroughMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API