Legal Opinion
Estrada-Rodriguez v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2007No. 06-75064PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Oscar Alejandro Estrada-Rodriguez seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) determination that he was removable as an aggravated felon based upon his conviction for resisting arrest under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-2508. The BIA characterized § 13-2508 as a crime of violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F), which classifies crimes of violence as aggravated felonies. Estrada-Rodriguez petitions this court to find that his offense does not constitute a crime of violence under categorical or modified categorical analysis. We deny review and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anthony Alphonsus v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Carlos Flores-Lopez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- United States v. Margarito Flores-CorderoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.