Legal Opinion
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 1, 1994No. 12723-1-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, C.J.
— In this declaratory judgment action brought by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Dairyland Insurance Company, the trial court determined the driver of a vehicle involved in a collision did not have the owner’s permission to use the vehicle and therefore no insurance coverage was provided under the driver’s automobile insurance policy or the owner’s automobile policy. We affirm.
On December 31,1991, Mary Lynn Peterson and Kimberly A. Peterson Kuhn were riding in a car owned by Floyd Peterson. The Peterson vehicle was involved in an accident with a vehicle driven by Shannon L. Martin.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Western Pac. Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Farmers Insurance v. U. S. F. & G. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Pierce v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Riley v. VIKING INSURANCE CO.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Eshelman v. Grange Ins. Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Co. v. Colby and LamotteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013