Legal Opinion
Riley v. VIKING INSURANCE CO.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 19, 1987No. 7766-7-IIIPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Troy Riley brought this action to declare coverage under a policy of insurance issued by Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin. The trial court found no coverage and dismissed the action. Mr. Riley appeals. We reverse.
The parties agree Mr. Riley is an insured under the Viking policy and stipulate to the following facts. On September 29, 1983, Mr. Riley was a passenger on a motorcycle which collided with a pickup truck driven by John Felch. The motorcycle was owned and operated by Vincent Norman at the time of the collision. Mr. Felch, the pickup driver who caused the accident, was uninsured.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- United Pacific Insurance v. Van's Westlake Union, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Assurance Company of America, a Maryland Corporation v. Wall & Associates LLC of Olympia, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bordeaux, Inc. v. American Safety Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kaplan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.