Legal Opinion

Eshelman v. Grange Ins. Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1968No. 39000PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing writs of garnishment against respondent insurance company.

The controversy involves interpretation and application of an omnibus clause in a policy of casualty insurance to the facts of the instant case.

Mr. and Mrs. Pease, defendants, owned a mink farm near Redmond, Washington. They hired Jack Shepherd to assist them. Shepherd was supposed to live at the farm, but the Peases were temporarily using the spare living facilities until remodeling work on their house was completed. Shep herd, therefore, used his own automobile each day to drive from his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Pac. Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Cypert v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wallin v. KnudtsonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Yurick v. McElroyWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. GRANGE INSURANCE v. OchoaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Moritz v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Grange Ins. Ass'n v. EschbackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API