Legal Opinion

Beaty v. Truck Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1992No. C010475PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

The issue presented is whether an insurer violates the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq., hereafter referred to as the Unruh Act) when it refuses to offer a couple cohabitating in a homosexual relationship the same insurance policy and at the same premium it regularly offers to married couples. Plaintiffs Larry Beaty and Boyce Hinman applied to defendant Truck Insurance Exchange for a joint umbrella liability insurance policy. Defendant denied the application because joint umbrella policies are issued only to married couples. Defendant offered instead to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Brown v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API