Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country Club
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
Plaintiffs, a lesbian couple who are registered domestic partners, sued defendant country club, to which one of them belongs, alleging that the club’s refusal to extend to them certain benefits it extends to married members of the club constitutes marital status discrimination under Civil Code section 51, familiarly known as the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the Act). The club obtained summary judgment on plaintiffs’ marital status discrimination claim and the Court of Appeal affirmed. We granted review to determine whether the Act prohibits discrimination based on marital status.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- CALIFORNIANS FOR DISAB. RIGHTS v. Mervyn'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.