People v. Garcia
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J.
Cano Garcia was charged with burglary. During his trial, it somehow became known that two members of the jury venire were lesbians. In fact, they both worked for the same gay and lesbian foundation. After the prosecution excused both women, defense counsel made a Wheeler motion. There was a discussion at the bench, and the trial court denied the motion, explaining, “Well, I am going to rule that sexual preference is not a cognizable group .... I don’t think that your sexual preference specifically relates to them sharing a common perspective or common social or…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Snetsinger v. Montana University SystemMontana Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.