Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
A State may tax a proportionate share of the income of a nondomiciliary corporation that carries out a particular business both inside and outside that State. Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 504 U. S. 768, 772 (1992). The State, however, may not tax income received by a corporation from an “ ‘ “unrelated business activity” ’ which constitutes a ‘“discrete business enterprise.”’” Id., at 773 (quoting Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis., 447 U. S. 207, 224 (1980), in turn quoting Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt., 445 U. S. 425, 442, 439 (1980)).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Life Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Northwood Construction Co. v. Township of Upper MorelandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Surtees v. VFJ Ventures, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Apple, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.