Legal Opinion

Northwood Construction Co. v. Township of Upper Moreland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 2004No. 12 M.D. Appeal Docket 2003PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NIGRO.

We granted allowance of appeal in this case to consider whether the Commonwealth Court erred in concluding that Appellee Township of Upper Moreland (the “Township”) could impose a Business Privilege Tax (“BPT”) on 100% of the gross receipts of Appellant Northwood Construction Company (“Northwood”), which is located in the Township but performs a substantial amount of work outside of the Township. For the following reasons, we conclude that the court erred insofar as it found that the Township’s taxation of receipts generated from Northwood’s out-of-state work did not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Hans Rees' Sons, Inc. v. North Carolina Ex Rel. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. FajtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. KMS Financial Services, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. V.L. Rendina, Inc. v. City of HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. AVANADE, INC. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Avanade, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API