Bolinske v. Herd
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Bolinske appeals a summary judgment dismissing his lawsuit against Thomas Herd and Gaddis, Kin & Herd, P.C. (“Gaddis”), a Colorado law firm, for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm the district court’s summary judgment.
I
[¶ 2] In September 1998, Bolinske contacted Herd, an attorney at Gaddis, for the purpose of representing two North Dakota residents, Ronald and Marci Schorsch (“the Sehorsches”), who were involved in a motor vehicle accident in Colorado. On September 17, 1998, Bolinske sent a letter to Herd, stating he understood he would receive one-third…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Cape v. Von MaurDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Hansen v. ScottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Larson v. DunnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Bird v. HillerMontana Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Intercept Corp. v. Calima Financial, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Estate of BrandtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Luger v. LugerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Wilkens v. WestbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Spirit Property Management v. VondellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.