Legal Opinion

Cape v. Von Maur

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 26, 1996No. PJM 94-2297PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Charles Cape and Technical Communications and Electronics Consultants, Ltd. (“TCEC”) sue Defendants Gerda von Maur, Reed von Maur and the law firm of Reed von Maur & Partners for legal malpractice, breach of contract, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The Court heard argument on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, Lack of Capacity and Lack of Standing and deferred ruling pending the parties’ submission of supplemental pleadings on the issue of the Court’s personal jurisdiction over…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Sher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & LatimerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  2. Exponential Biotherapies, Inc. v. Houthoff Buruma N.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Ex Parte Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Bond v. MessermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Government of Egypt Procurement Office v. M/V Robert E. LeeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API