State v. Condict
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Presiding Judge.
A jury convicted Barry Condict (“Defendant”) of possession of chemicals with the intent to create a controlled substance in violation of § 195.420. 1 The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender to twelve years’ imprisonment with the Department of Corrections. Defendant appeals this conviction and sentence alleging (1) there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction, (2) instructional error, and (3) § 195.420 is unconstitutionally vague.
This court affirms the judgment of conviction and sentence.
FACTS
In January 2000,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. NolanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kotila v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BeggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. CarneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bolden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. AngleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.