Bolden v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.
Introduction
Randy Bolden (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance when he “proposed” improper jury instructions that failed to include “multiple assailants” language as required by the Missouri Approved Instructions-Criminal on self-defense and defense of another.1 We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
1. Jury Trial
On the evening of April 21, 2007,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. WurtzbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Richard John WhippleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State of Missouri v. Arthur B. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Stickler v. AshcroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. StarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Mason v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.