Legal Opinion

Young v. Wierenga

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1946No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 43,243PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff purchased an automobile from the defendant, a used-car dealer, and paid $1,625 for the same, which sum was $720 in excess of the maximum price fixed for the sale of said automobile by the office of price administration (OPA) under authority of the Federal emergency price control act of 1942, as amended. * Plaintiff then brought the instant suit for $2,160, treble damages, under said act. The case came up for trial by jury, and at the close- of plaintiff’s proofs, on motion the court directed a verdict for the defendant. From the judgment entered thereon plaintiff appeals. The ground…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lightbody v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Union Steam Pump Sales Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Zwang v. A. & P. Food StoresAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
  5. People v. . BradfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. OdellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Crowley v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Keyser v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Allen v. WaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Pierce v. AnagnostakisUtah Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API