Legal Opinion

Faust v. KAI Technologies, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2000No. 980292Published

1Opinion of the Court

15 P.3d 1266 (2000)

2000 UT 82

David L. FAUST, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

KAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and American Phoenix, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 980292.

Supreme Court of Utah.

October 6, 2000.

Rehearing Denied November 28, 2000.

Gordon W. Duval, Christine M. Petersen, Pleasant Grove, for plaintiff.

David K. Detton, Salt Lake City, and Creighton R. Magid, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendants.

HOWE, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiff David L. Faust appeals from a judgment awarded him against his former employer, defendant KAI Technologies, Inc., which included $1500 in attorney fees. He contends that by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Baldwin v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nelson v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API