Legal Opinion

State v. Rundle

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1984No. 15442PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a “Motion for Reconsideration of Sentence.” The motion was submitted by appellant Mark M. Rundle approximately seven weeks after receiving an indeterminate sentence of five years for manufacturing a controlled substance. The district court treated the motion as one for correction or reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 and denied it. We affirm.

On appeal Rundle raises two principal issues. First, he contends that the district court misconstrued his motion as one seeking correction of an illegal sentence and thus failed to consider the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. WolfIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WrightIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Brandt v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. JamesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. HoffmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. NickersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API