Corestates Bank of Delaware, N.A. v. Richter
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
EAKIN, J.:
Donald M. Richter and Dora M. Richter appeal from the order denying their motion for arbitration. Finding this appeal to be interlocutory and non-appealable, we quash.
This matter stems from the issuance of two credit cards to the Richters by Cores-tates Bank of Delaware, N.A., or its predecessors. The Richters defaulted on paying the card balances, and in 1993 Corestates filed suit, seeking approximately $21,000 in charges, interest and late fees. Pretrial motions and discovery ensued, and in January 1997 the case was finally listed to be tried in the June 1997 term; it was later…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND v. McCORMICK DRAY LINE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Goral v. Fox Ridge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- After Six, Inc. v. Abraham Zion Corp. (In Re After Six, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Monahan v. McGrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- Municipal Authority of the Borough of Midland v. Ohioville Borough Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015