Legal Opinion

Corestates Bank of Delaware, N.A. v. Richter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1998No. 03842PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAKIN, J.:

Donald M. Richter and Dora M. Richter appeal from the order denying their motion for arbitration. Finding this appeal to be interlocutory and non-appealable, we quash.

This matter stems from the issuance of two credit cards to the Richters by Cores-tates Bank of Delaware, N.A., or its predecessors. The Richters defaulted on paying the card balances, and in 1993 Corestates filed suit, seeking approximately $21,000 in charges, interest and late fees. Pretrial motions and discovery ensued, and in January 1997 the case was finally listed to be tried in the June 1997 term; it was later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND v. McCORMICK DRAY LINE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Goral v. Fox Ridge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. After Six, Inc. v. Abraham Zion Corp. (In Re After Six, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Monahan v. McGrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Municipal Authority of the Borough of Midland v. Ohioville Borough Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API