Legal Opinion

United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 29, 1929No. 3114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Paragraph 31 of the Tariff Act of 1922 reads as follows:

Par. 31. Compounds of pyroxylin, of other cellulose esters or ethers, or of cellulose, by whatever name known (except compounds of cellulose known as vulcanized or hard fiber), in blocks, sheets, rods, tubes, or other forms, and not made into finished or partly finished articles, 40 cents per pound; made into finished or partly finished articles, of which any of the foregoing is the component material of chief value, 60 per centum ad valorem: Provided, That all such articles (except photographic and moving-picture films), whether or not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Saltonstall v. WiebuschSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. FoscatoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Lunham & Reeve, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. J. B. Henriques, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Nylonge Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API