Legal Opinion

United States v. Foscato

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 18, 1915No. 1477PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36586 (T. D. 34789).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Small prismoidal pieces or blocks of glass, some gilded and others colored yellow, green, blue, orange, and maroon, were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as articles of glass, colored, and assessed for duty at 60 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 98 of the tariff act of 1909 which reads as follows:

98. Glass bottles, decanters, and all articles of every description composed wholly or in chief value of glass, ornamented or decorated in any manner, or cut, engraved, painted, decorated, ornamented, colored, stained, silvered, gilded, etched, sand…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MescallSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. Wakem & McLaughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. In re KnoxDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1900
  5. R. Hoehn Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kleinberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. BacheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Knott v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  5. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API