D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The importer imported at the port of New York a certain nickel catalyst, more particularly hereinafter described, which the Collector of Customs classified as dutiable under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, as an article composed in chief value of nickel, and assessed duty upon the same at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under the second part of the paragraph, since it was not plated with platinum, gold or silver, or colored with gold lacquer.
The importer protested the said classification and assessment of duty and claimed the catalyst to be dutiable as a combination or mixture of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Aetna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- United States v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.