Legal Opinion

Pasternak v. Pasternak

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Was the stipulation “made in court and entered in the minutes?’’ Sec. 269.46 (2), Stats., provides:

“No agreement, stipulation, or consent, between the parties or their attorneys, in respect to the proceedings in an action or special proceeding, shall be binding unless made in court and entered in the minutes or made in writing and subscribed b)r the party to be bound thereby or by his attorney.”

Appellants claim that the stipulation was neither made in court nor entered in the minutes. On the one hand, the reporter’s transcript of the stipulation and the order signed by the court at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Czap v. CzapWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Urban v. TrautmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. v. Royal Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Farmers Automobile Insurance v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Burmeister v. VondrachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Schmidt v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API