Legal Opinion

Allen v. Raley's

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2017No. 14-17275Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Anthony B. Alen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment, after a jury trial, in his employment discrimination action under Title VII and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) against Raley’s Corp. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Alen waived his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdict on his claim of a racially hostile work environment by failing to move for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial before the district court. See Nitco Holding Corp. v. Boujikian, 491 F.3d 1086, 1088-90 (9th Cir.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marsha Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Efrain Reynaga v. Roseburg Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Nitco Holding Corp. v. Zareh Boujikian James B. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Ravel v. Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API