Legal Opinion
Efrain Reynaga v. Roseburg Forest Products
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 26, 2017No. 14-35028PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge BEA
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Efrain Reynaga and his son Richard Reynaga worked as millwrights *683for Roseburg Forest Products (“Rose-burg”). According to Efrain, he and his son were the only millwrights of Mexican descent at Roseburg. Efrain alleges that during the course of his employment, he was subjected to disparate treatment and a hostile work environment because of his race or national origin.
Efrain developed a contentious relationship with lead millwright, Timothy Bra-naugh (“Branaugh”), who allegedly harassed Efrain with racially disparaging comments. In…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Andrew Mattioda v. Clarence William Nelson IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Stephanie Sharp v. S&S Activewear, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Casey Clarkson v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Stewart v. SBE Entertainment Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017
- Maner v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.