Rosenbloom v. Senior Resource, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Senior District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the Court on July 17, 1997, upon the motion of defendants, Senior Resource, Inc., Alice Moorman, and Kathy Mosavat, 1 for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants seek dismissal of Rosenbloom’s eight count complaint. The Court will grant Defendants’ motion in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Senior Resource, Inc. is a social service agency that provides activities, community centers, transportation coordination, and adult daycare for seniors. Its mission is to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- McKenzie v. Lunds, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Costilla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Mutua v. TEXAS ROADHOUSE MANAGEMENT CORP.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2010
- Costilla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.