Legal Opinion

Costilla v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1997No. C8-97-711Published

1Opinion of the Court

571 N.W.2d 587 (1997)

Maria C. COSTILLA, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

No. C8-97-711.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 25, 1997.

Sonja Dunnwald Peterson, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, Cassandra O. O'Hern, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J, and NORTON and WILLIS, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant sued the State of Minnesota for sexual harassment under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) and raised other common law claims. The district court granted respondent summary judgment…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API