Legal Opinion

Grader v. City of Lynnwood

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 13, 1989No. 20601-0-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

The City of Lynnwood appeals from a jury verdict in favor of William E. Grader, in which the jury found that the City's interpretation of a land use ordinance violated substantive due process and equal protection of the law, entitling Grader to $1.65 million in damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The City's principal claim is that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the § 1983 claims as a matter of law. It contends that Grader failed to introduce sufficient evidence to sustain either his equal protection or his due process § 1983 claims, or to prove that the alleged civil rights…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Douglas v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Thomas v. Wilfac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API