Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Buchenau
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 10, 1942No. Civ. 87PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
This is a claim and delivery action.
The facts necessary to an understanding of this action are as follows :
The plaintiff, R. M. Wilson, was the owner of 222 head of cattle located on his ranch five miles from Doming, New Mexico. Eighteen of these cattle were branded “ 3W”, and the balance were branded “ O ”•
On November 10, 1940 one Ike Ratner called at plaintiff’s ranch and, after some preliminary negotiations, purchased 222 head of cattle with brands as stated. The plaintiff had never seen Ike Ratner before, nor had any business dealings with him, and had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Espy v. Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Heney v. Sutro & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Keegan v. LenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. McNearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- States v. Eleven Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1951