Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Peterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1951Published

1Opinion of the Court

192 Or. 97 (1951)

233 P.2d 216

SWIFT & COMPANY and ARMOUR & COMPANY

v.

PETERSON, DIRECTOR, OREGON STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued March 20, 1951.

Affirmed as modified June 6, 1951.

Petition for rehearing denied July 6, 1951.

Catharine Carson Barsch, Assistant Attorney General, of Salem, and Blaine Hallock, of Baker, argued the cause for Appellant. With them on the brief was George Neuner, Attorney General, of Salem.

Manley B. Strayer, of Portland, argued the cause for Respondents. With him on the brief were Hart, Spencer, McCulloch, Rockwood & Davies, of Portland.

Before…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API